How common is the Common Wealth




The Common Wealth: A Reflection

What is the Commonwealth?

This morning, I woke up with a persistent thought ringing in my mind: What is the Commonwealth?

Taken at face value, the term feels promising, even idealistic. If I’d somehow fallen asleep in the 1600s and woken up in 2024 to hear the phrase "the Commonwealth," I’d probably imagine something like:

  • "Wealth for the common people."
  • "A shared pool of resources distributed equitably."
  • Or perhaps, "a collective fund to which everyone has an equal claim."

But is that what the Commonwealth actually is?

Understanding the Commonwealth

From what I’ve gathered, membership in the Commonwealth supposedly brings several benefits:

  1. Political and diplomatic influence
    Member states have a platform to discuss global issues, advocate for their interests, and influence international policies—particularly useful for smaller nations.

  2. Economic cooperation
    The Commonwealth fosters shared trade opportunities, investment potential, and programs supporting economic development.

  3. Development assistance
    The Commonwealth Secretariat provides technical aid in areas like governance, education, and healthcare.

  4. Shared values
    Democracy, human rights, and the rule of law form the backbone of cooperation and dialogue.

  5. People-to-people connections
    Cultural exchanges, educational opportunities, and simplified movement between member nations help foster unity.

  6. Youth engagement
    Youth leadership and participation are actively promoted through initiatives and programs.

  7. Climate change advocacy
    Members collaborate to address shared environmental challenges and sustainable development goals.

In essence, the Commonwealth portrays itself as a "family of nations" bound by historical ties to the British Empire and united by shared values and agreements.

My Experience with the Commonwealth

When I first arrived in the UK over 30 years ago, I didn’t need a visa to enter. As a citizen of a Commonwealth member country, I was issued one at the airport—a privilege that felt like a tangible link to this "family of nations."

But by the end of that year, the rules changed. Suddenly, no Commonwealth citizen could enter the UK without a valid visa.

I understand the rationale: stricter immigration policies were likely a response to issues caused by a few unscrupulous individuals. Still, from a practical perspective, it felt like the UK had made a one-sided decision—benefiting from this change while the rest of the Commonwealth lost one of its most valued privileges.

I vividly remember students queuing outside the immigration office in Croydon as early as 4 a.m., hoping to get inside by 9 a.m. They would then endure hours of suspicion and scrutiny, all while trying to prove their legitimacy.

The Burning Question

So here’s my burning question: Who really benefits from the Commonwealth today? And where is the "wealth" in this equation?

Is there a shared "wealth tank" that member countries contribute to and draw from annually? Or is the Commonwealth more of a symbolic entity—a relic of the British Empire’s colonial past?

The Need for Relevance

In today’s world of globalization, where alliances like the EU, BRIC, and other trade partnerships dominate, does the Commonwealth still serve a purpose?

For many citizens of member states, one of the most tangible benefits—the privilege of visa-free entry to the UK—is long gone. This, for many, was once regarded as the most significant perk of Commonwealth membership.

Perhaps I’m naive, and maybe I haven’t done enough research, but can someone provide me with a clear and compelling list of the benefits of being part of the Commonwealth in 2025?

Well, I wonder...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Power of a Name: Africa Rebrand Agenda 2030

Image
  A Call to Action For every country in Africa to embrace its true identity by changing its name, and for Africa as a continent to redefine itself by 2030. Reclaiming Our Identity: A New Name, A New Future for Africa Africa stands on the threshold of a profound transformation—one that begins with reclaiming its identity, redefining its purpose, and reshaping its future. For centuries, the name Africa has been tied to colonial imposition, external narratives, and a history of exploitation. But now, the continent has the opportunity to choose a name that reflects its true essence—one of strength, unity, and self-reliance. This moment of change aligns with a broader shift: Africa’s transition from dependency to self-sufficiency. The recent termination of USAID funding by the United States is not a setback but a wake-up call—an invitation for Africa to redefine itself, moving from a beneficiary to a benefactor. A new name for the continent would symbolize this rebirth, a break from im...
Read more

The Human Body as the perfect organisational system

Image
I wrote this article many years ago now and I thought its time to share it.   Last Sunday afternoon, as I lay on the couch with my head rest ing on my husband’s stomach, I could hear the subtle sounds of his bowel movements. My mind wandered to the intricate, efficient machinery that is the human body. I began to think about how an organization or company could achieve similar levels of efficiency in fulfilling its vision. That’s when an idea struck me: why not write a book exploring how the mechanisms of the human body can serve as a guide to building and maintaining the most efficient organization possible? I began contemplating the ultimate purpose of the human body—its function as a vessel that carries life to its fullest potential. In Greek, this concept is expressed as σῴζω (sōzō), meaning "to save, rescue, and deliver"—which also happens to be the meaning of the name Jesus. It refers to a state of perfect order, where nothing is broken or missing, and everything is f...
Read more

Fiscal Policy for a Global Economic Recovery.

Image
Revised Proposal for a New Political System:  "Accountabilism" I watched a video recently that argued democracy, as a political system of governance, may be becoming obsolete. The presenter pointed out several reasons, emphasizing that the concept of democracy—specifically "one person, one vote"—fails to address a critical aspect of human behavior: the inherent desire for pleasure-seeking. This notion resonated with me, and I’ve long believed that pure democracy is a myth. The very advocates of democracy often manipulate elections through various means—whether by hacking computer systems, spreading misinformation, slandering opposition, or using fear and financial incentives to sway voters. In reality, political parties are more focused on winning elections than on genuinely serving the people. If democracy is truly “for the people, by the people,” it has failed because the people often make decisions based not on truth or facts, but on coercion, manipulation, or s...
Read more